Loneliness of Curleys wife Essay Example for Free

Dejection of Curleys spouse Essay The creator never reveals to us the name of Curleys spouse in the novel, which could be for some reasons. E. g. she wasnt sufficiently significant or even in light of the fact that she was a lady. Be that as it may, I think it was on the grounds that she was viewed as one of Curleys assets, and as a result of this everybody moved toward her with flurry. They were all scared of Curley and didnt need any trouble from him so they disregarded her. They didnt address her and overlooked her more often than not which could inevitably cause an individual forlorn and to feel undesirable. She didnt like this so she attempted to take care of business. She put on alluring garments, and was intensely made up with full rouged lips and generally dispersed eyes. Fingernails painted red and hair in little bunches like hotdogs. Clearly she needed to pull in some consideration from the laborers on the farm, she simply needed someone to see her. Yet, as in doing this she is marked a tart and jailbait. George doesnt see past the external spread when she returns and sees a lady attempting to get somebody captured or slaughtered, so he carefully cautions Lenny to avoid her. Another explanation behind Curleys wifes forlornness could have been that she was the main lady on the farm so she has no other female to babble to, and all the men are disregarding her so she has completely no one on the farm to visit with aside from Curley. Curley isnt a decent spouse as he sees her for the most part as a belonging and not his better half, and in this way doesnt treat her such well. He is one of the primary reasons that she feels so miserable. He powers his significant other to remain at home alone consistently as he disallows her to go out in dread that she may proceed to wander off with one of the farm laborers. He himself isn't too steadfast either as he visits massage parlors with different men toward the month's end despite the fact that he is hitched. She admits to us while visiting with Lenny that she doesnt love Curley. She just wedded him due to her mom. She had met a film maker that had said he was going to place her in the motion pictures, and when the letter didnt originate from him she thought her mom had taken it. So she moved of and wedded Curley possibly as an approach to seek retribution on her mom. While almost certainly, the man wasnt a film maker and most likely needed just to get her to lay down with him. When chatting with Lenny she likewise discloses to him all the things she needed in her life. She needed to wear decent garments, remain in large lodgings, have pictures taken of her and to be an entertainer. She even implied that she was going to leave Curley some time or another by saying possibly I will some time or another when discussing an acting profession. Curleys spouse appears to be dreadfully desolate and gets extraordinary delight out of chatting with Lenny in the stable. She even lets him stroke her hair creating an incredible uproar and in the long run prompting her fierce demise. In any case, it was quick and when Candy saw her body he saw that her face was sweet and youthful. She hadnt a consideration on the planet. All the throb for consideration and discontent were gone from her face and she was at last settled. I for one dont think she is the reason for all the difficulty since she was just looking for a touch of organization. She scarcely conversed with anybody on the farm for a very long time and whenever she at long last finds the opportunity, you cannot reprimand her for needing to take it. It perhaps is a piece her deficiency as she let Lenny stroke her hair, however she didnt realize what he would do when he wouldnt let go and began to freeze. She did at first get Lenny executed however I dont figure she did it purposefully as she talks no longing to get herself murdered. It is a touch of everybodys shortcoming, if the men had addressed her she might not have needed to go into the horse shelter with Lenny and along these lines not have been slaughtered. Lenny and Georges dream may have materialized if Curleys spouse had not been executed so in a manner this significant occasion changed the entirety of their lives until the end of time. 30/04/2007 Simon Gurney Show review just The above see is unformatted text This understudy composed bit of work is one of numerous that can be found in our GCSE John Steinbeck area.

Dysfunctional Relationships Between Sonny’s Blues and Shiloh Free Essays

Jeremy Raymond Professor Gazzara ENG 102-109 April sixth, 2013 It Takes Two To Tango What makes a relationship broken? Is it the progressions one finds in another whether they be physical, passionate, or money related? Is it an adjustment in their own character that is currently changing their perspectives on their relative or critical other? Tina B. Tessina characterizes a useless relationship as this: Useless Relationships will be connections that don't play out their suitable capacity; that is, they don't sincerely bolster the members, cultivate correspondence among them, properly challenge them, or get ready or sustain them for life in the bigger world. (Tessina 1) In â€Å"Sonny’s Blues† and â€Å"Shiloh†, we see two unique kinds of broken connections. We will compose a custom paper test on Useless Relationships Between Sonny’s Blues and Shiloh or on the other hand any comparative point just for you Request Now In â€Å"Shiloh† we see a marriage connection between Norma Jean and Leroy Moffit. In â€Å"Sonny’s Blues†, we see a fraternity connection among Sonny and his sibling. These connections are viewed as useless dependent on the activities and absence of activities dependent on those included. In Mason’s â€Å"Shiloh†, the connection among Leroy and Norma Jean was looking great so far. They have been hitched sixteen years and had a child named Randy. Randy died from unexpected baby passing condition at a youthful age. We can derive through the content that both Norma Jean and Leroy were left damaged by this. The demise of a youngster can leave an individual damaged and stirred up for the remainder of their lives. The couple’s relationship takes a turn south because of various reasons. One explanation being Norma Jeans recently discovered way of life. Since the time Leroy endured his mishap, She has transformed into the masculine figure of the family unit. She’s beginning to lift loads to reinforce herself up. Leroy is currently watching changes in Norma Jean he has never observed. Notwithstanding lifting loads at home, she is presently going to a working out class which puzzles Leroy. Through Leroy’s eyes, she is as of now a changed lady. Other than for Norma Jeans’ freshly discovered physical changes in herself, she is additionally going to night classes. Norma Jean is additionally creating rest designs that worry Leroy as well as Mabel, her mom. Mabel in a discussion with Leroy states â€Å"She used to head to sleep with the chickens. Presently you state she’s up all hours. † (73). The statement shows how both Leroy, her better half who’s adored her for as far back as sixteen years and Mabel, her own mom are stressed and befuddled by her new examples throughout everyday life. Notwithstanding changes in Norma Jean, Leroy has experienced changes too. Since he had his mishap, he can't drive tractor trailers the nation over any longer. He is currently cooped up within the house in light of his physical issue. He has built up a leisure activity for building makes and has transformed that into an arrangement with outlines to assemble a full scale log lodge. The idea of the lodge sickens Norma Jean, where in a discussion between Leroy, Norma Jean, and Mabel, Leroy states, â€Å"I’m expecting to assemble us a log house† (70). Norma Jean rapidly reacts to Leroy with â€Å"Like hell you are† (70). She plainly gives her objection with his arrangement. We as perusers can decipher that Leroy is a man stuck previously and Norma Jean has developed into a renewed person. We see an endeavor at settling the useless couples relationship when they travel to Shiloh. Leroy is attempting to clutch the affection for his life while Norma Jean is attempting to free herself and proceed onward to greater and better things throughout everyday life. She has transformed her, genuinely and intellectually and Leroy has done nothing with his life which is the reason she is leaving him. The endeavor at compromise bombs horribly and Norma Jean and Leroy split ways and go on with their different lives. In â€Å"Sonny’s Blues† we see another useless relationship, this time between siblings. The storyteller of the story, is the sibling of Sonny. A teacher in Harlem, he has grown up around people who have experienced liquor abuse, illicit drug habits and a lot more issues. Like Leroy from â€Å"Shiloh†, he is a family man additionally reeling from the loss of their most youthful kid, Grace. The passing of their youngster prodded the sibling into keeping in touch with his disturbed sibling Sonny. Sonny was the more youthful sibling of the two who has experienced numerous troublesome life exercises all through his short life up until this point. Sonny has experienced a heroin enslavement which landed him in a neighborhood prison which further debilitated the bond between the two siblings. Sonny’s sibling has lived in Harlem and has seen heroin addicts and survivors of liquor abuse and has demonstrated no regret for them. We see Sonny’s siblings narrow mindedness for the men around Harlem who experience the ill effects of a compulsion when he is conversing with an old companion of Sonny’s after he leaves the school one day. â€Å"Look. Don’t disclose to me your tragic story, on the off chance that it was up to me, I’d give you one. † (294). This shows how Sonny’s sibling is detached with respect to individuals who have experienced a habit. While Sonny was in prison, the relationship kept on lessening. After Sonny’s discharge from jail, their relationship started to recuperate. Notwithstanding his illicit drug use, Sonny’s powerlessness to settle on a vocation in life aggravates his sibling. Sonny’s goals spread similar to India, a military activity positioned all through the world , or potentially finding a vocation as an artist in his old neighborhood of Harlem. This irregularity of Sonny rankles his more seasoned sibling, who has made a guarantee with their mom to care for him and ensure he grows up to be an appropriate man. Rather than the connection between Norma Jean and Leroy, Sonny and his siblings relationship can reconstruct after a period of hardship between the two. Sonny can recoup completely from his heroin compulsion and start to recover his life on target. Notwithstanding cutting his heroin habit, he settles on a real existence choice with respect to his future and decides to turn into an artist in Harlem. The topic of useless connections is available in the two stories with totally different endings. In â€Å"Shiloh†, we see a connection between two wedded individuals end suddenly. Leroy, the man stuck before and clutching what he knows and Norma Jean, the lady who has significantly altered herself. Contrary energies don't pull in and the marriage stopped to proceed after their visit to the Shiloh front line. In â€Å"Sonny’s Blues†, the fraternity connection among Sonny and his sibling can recuperate and advance because of the progressions Sonny has made with himself. Works Cited Tessina, Tina. â€Å"What Is A Dysfunctional Relationship? †Ã‚ What Is A Dysfunctional Relationship? N. p. , n. d. Web. 09 Apr. 2013 Mason, Bobbie Ann. Shiloh. N. p. : Flamingo, 1988. Print. Baldwin, James. Sonny’s Blues. Mankato, MN: Creative Education, 1993. Print. Instructions to refer to Dysfunctional Relationships Between Sonny’s Blues and Shiloh, Papers

Ta-Da! The Longlists for the 2019 National Book Awards

Ta-Da! The Longlists for the 2019 National Book Awards Its that time of year again!!!! “What is your favorite season?” #NBAwards pic.twitter.com/FbOwojD1iv Anna Dobben (@annadobben) September 16, 2019 The National Book Foundation announced all longlists for the  2019 National Book Awards this week, and I could not be more excited. The NBAs are the Academy Awards for books. There are five categories: Fiction, Nonfiction, Poetry, Translated Literature, and Young People’s Literature.  And this years nominees are AMAZING. Heres a rundown of the titles: Young People’s Literature View this post on Instagram Its the first day of #NBAwards Longlist announcements! We are beyond excited to announce the ten titles on the 2019 National Book Awards Longlist for Young Peoples Literature. Congratulations to all, and welcome to the family! . . #bookstagram #NBAwards #literature #reading #amreading #books #yabookstagram A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 16, 2019 at 7:36am PDT Kwame Alexander and Kadir Nelson, The Undefeated Versify / Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Laurie Halse Anderson, Shout Viking Books for Young Readers / Penguin Random House Akwaeke Emezi, Pet Make Me a World / Penguin Random House Cynthia Kadohata, A Place to Belong Atheneum/Caitlyn Dlouhy Books / Simon Schuster Jason Reynolds, Look Both Ways: A Tale Told in Ten Blocks Atheneum/Caitlyn Dlouhy Books / Simon Schuster Randy Ribay, Patron Saints of Nothing Kokila / Penguin Random House Laura Ruby, Thirteen Doorways, Wolves Behind Them All Balzer + Bray / HarperCollins Publishers Martin W. Sandler, 1919: The Year That Changed America Bloomsbury Children’s Books / Bloomsbury Publishing Hal Schrieve, Out of Salem Triangle Square / Seven Stories Press Colleen AF Venable and Ellen T. Crenshaw, Kiss Number 8 First Second Books / Macmillan Publishers From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are An Na, the author of four novels, including A Step from Heaven, a finalist for the 2017 National Book Award; Elana K. Arnold, whose novel What Girls Are Made Of  was a finalist for the 2017 National Book Award; Kristen Gilligan, the co-owner of Tattered Cover Book Store, in Denver; Varian Johnson, the author of The Parker Inheritance  and a member of the faculty at Vermont College of Fine Arts; and Deborah Taylor, a retired librarian and an adjunct professor of young-adult literature at the University of Maryland. Translated Literature View this post on Instagram We are so pleased to announce the Longlist for the #NBAwards   for Translated Literature, the fifth Awards category introduced just last year. A huge round of applause for these writers and translators! . . #bookstagram #books #literature #literaryawards #reading #amreading #translation #translator #translatedliterature A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 17, 2019 at 7:36am PDT Rioter Pierce Alquist, who is an expert on translated literature, also did a great round-up of the titles here. The ten titles on the longlist, originally written in ten different languages, include seven novels, two memoirs, and a collection of essays. Naja Marie Aidt, When Death Takes Something from You Give It Back: Carl’s Book Translated by Denise Newman Coffee House Press Eliane Brum, The Collector of Leftover Souls: Field Notes on Brazil’s Everyday Insurrections Translated by Diane Grosklaus Whitty Graywolf Press Nona Fernández, Space Invaders Translated by Natasha Wimmer Graywolf Press Vigdis Hjorth, Will and Testament Translated by Charlotte Barslund Verso Fiction / Verso Books Khaled Khalifa, Death Is Hard Work Translated by Leri Price Farrar, Straus Giroux / Macmillan Publishers László Krasznahorkai, Baron Wenckheim’s Homecoming Translated by Ottilie Mulzet New Directions Scholastique Mukasonga, The Barefoot Woman Translated by Jordan Stump Archipelago Books Yoko Ogawa, The Memory Police Translated by Stephen Snyder Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Pajtim Statovci, Crossing Translated by David Hackston Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Olga Tokarczuk, Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead Translated by Antonia Lloyd-Jones Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Keith Gessen, a founding editor of n+1, and the author, most recently, of A Terrible Country; Elisabeth Jaquette, a translator and the executive director of the American Literary Translators Association; Katie Kitamura, whose most recent novel, A Separation, has been translated into sixteen languages; Idra Novey, the author of Those Who Knew, who teaches fiction at Princeton University; and Shuchi Saraswat, who has worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, GrubStreet, and an independent bookseller. Poetry View this post on Instagram Its day three of #NBAwards  Longlist announcements, and we have ten amazing collections to share with you. Announcing  the Longlist for the 2019 National Book Award for Poetry. . . #bookstagram #literature #books #reading #amreading #literaryawards #literaryaward #poetry #poetrycommunity A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 18, 2019 at 7:47am PDT Dan Beachy-Quick, Variations on Dawn and Dusk Omnidawn Publishing Jericho Brown, The Tradition Copper Canyon Press Toi Derricotte, ‘I’: New and Selected Poems University of Pittsburgh Press Camonghne Felix, Build Yourself a Boat Haymarket Books Ilya Kaminsky, Deaf Republic Graywolf Press Ariana Reines, A Sand Book Tin House Books Mary Ruefle, Dunce Wave Books Carmen Giménez Smith, Be Recorder Graywolf Press Arthur Sze, Sight Lines Copper Canyon Press Brian Teare, Doomstead Days Nightboat Books From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Jos Charles, the author of feeld,  which was longlisted for the 2017 National Book Award for Poetry; John Evans, the owner of DIESEL, a bookstore in Los Angeles; Vievee Francis, who has written three books of poetry, including Forest Primeval; Cathy Park Hong, the poetry editor of  The New Republic  and the author of Engine Empire; and Mark Wunderlich, the director of the Bennington Writing Seminars graduate program, whose new book, God of Nothingness,  is forthcoming. Nonfiction View this post on Instagram It’s Nonfiction day! ?? ?The #NBAwards excitement continues with the fourth category of the weeks announcements. These are the ten titles longlisted for the National Book Award for Nonfiction.? . . #bookstagram #literature #literaryawards #literaryaward #books #reading #amreading #nonfiction #memoir A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 19, 2019 at 7:30am PDT Hanif Abdurraqib, Go Ahead in the Rain: Notes to A Tribe Called Quest University of Texas Press Sarah M. Broom, The Yellow House Grove Press / Grove Atlantic Tressie McMillan Cottom, Thick: And Other Essays The New Press Carolyn Forché, What You Have Heard is True: A Memoir of Witness and Resistance Penguin Press / Penguin Random House Patrick Radden Keefe, Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland Doubleday / Penguin Random House David Treuer, The Heartbeat of Wounded Knee: Native America from 1890 to the Present Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House Greg Grandin, The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Metropolitan Books / Macmillan Publishers Iliana Regan, Burn the Place: A Memoir Agate Midway / Agate Publishing, Inc. Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership The University of North Carolina Press Albert Woodfox with Leslie George, Solitary Grove Press / Grove Atlantic From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Erica Armstrong Dunbar, a professor of history at Rutgers University and a finalist for a 2017 National Book Award; Carolyn Kellogg, an award-winning culture writer and former books editor of the Los Angeles  Times; Mark Laframboise, who has worked for more than twenty years at the Politics and Prose bookstore, in Washington, D.C.; Kiese Laymon, the author, most recently, of Heavy: An American Memoir,  and a professor of English at the University of Mississippi; and Jeff Sharlet, an editor-at-large for  Virginia Quarterly Review, a winner of a National Magazine Award, and an associate professor at Dartmouth College. Fiction View this post on Instagram ?? Its the final list! ? We are absolutely thrilled to announce the ten books on the Longlist for the 2019 National Book Award for Fiction. #NBAwards . . #bookstagram #books #literature #literaryawards #literaryaward #reading #amreading #fiction A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 20, 2019 at 7:30am PDT Taffy Brodesser-Akner, Fleishman Is in Trouble Random House / Penguin Random House Susan Choi, Trust Exercise Henry Holt Company / Macmillan Publishers Kali Fajardo-Anstine, Sabrina Corina: Stories One World / Penguin Random House Marlon James, Black Leopard, Red Wolf Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House Laila Lalami, The Other Americans Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Kimberly King Parsons, Black Light: Stories Vintage / Penguin Random House Helen Phillips, The Need Simon Schuster Julia Phillips, Disappearing Earth Alfred A. Knopf / Penguin Random House Ocean Vuong, On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous Penguin Press / Penguin Random House Colson Whitehead, The Nickel Boys Doubleday / Penguin Random House From the New Yorker announcement: This year’s judges for the category were Dorothy Allison, the author of Bastard out of Carolina,  a National Book Award finalist; Ruth Dickey, the executive director of Seattle Arts Lectures; Javier Ramirez, a longtime Chicago indie-book seller and the co-owner of Madison Street Books; Danzy Senna, a recipient of the Whiting Award and the author, most recently, of New People, a New York  Times  Notable Book; and Jeff VanderMeer, the best-selling author of the Southern Reach Trilogy, whose work has been translated into thirty-eight languages. Congratulations to all the nominees! Im so glad I dont have to pick, because my head would explode. The shortlists will be announced October 8, and the winners will be announced November 20 at the  70th National Book Awards Ceremony.

7 Writing Contests for Kids

Essay on causes of french revoultionary war - 1624 Words

The causes of the French Revolution, the uprising which brought the regime of King Louis XVI to an end, were manifold. France in 1789 was one of the richest and most powerful nations in Europe; only in Great Britain and the Netherlands did the common people have more freedom and less chance of arbitrary punishment. Nevertheless, the ancien rà ©gime was brought down, partly by its own rigidity in the face of a changing world, partly by the ambitions of a rising bourgeoisie, allied with aggrieved peasants and wage-earners and with individuals of all classes who were influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment. As the revolution proceeded and as power devolved from the monarchy to legislative bodies, the conflicting interests of these†¦show more content†¦The proletariat and the non-bourgeois strata of the middle class had either not yet evolved interests which were different from those of the bourgeoisie or they did not yet constitute independent classes or class divisions. Therefore, where they opposed the bourgeoisie, as they did in France in 1793 and 1794, [that is to say, during the Reign of Terror] they fought only for the attainment of the aims of the bourgeoisie, albeit in a non-bourgeois manner. The entire French terrorism was just a plebeian way of dealing with the enemies of the bourgeoisie: absolutism, feudalism and philistinism.\\\\\\ [1] (http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/12/15.htm) Economics Debt Since 1614, the French monarchy had operated without resort to a legislature. Kings had managed their fiscal affairs by increasing the burden of the ancient and unequal system of taxes, by borrowing money, and sometimes by selling noble titles and other privileges; however, because noble titles exempted the holder from future taxes, the purchasers of titles were effectively buying an annuity. This led to the long-running fiscal crisis of the French government. On the eve of the revolution, France was deeply indebted, so deeply as to be effectively bankrupt. Extravagant expenditures by Louis XIV on luxuries such as Versailles were compounded by heavy expenditures on the Seven Years War

Battling over bottled water Free Essays

Spring, which is on a private deer-hunting ranch, to the bottling plant. Locals are questioning whom the water Nestle is pumping belongs to. The argument is that although Nestle owns the land, the water is a public resource. We will write a custom essay sample on Battling over bottled water or any similar topic only for you Order Now Within the Utilitarian theory, in the eyes of the Nestle Company, their actions can be deemed ethical for the fact that the bottling plant has created a substantial amount of jobs for the locals. It was stated that the 262 million gallons of water being pumped are less than one percent of the annual charge rate of the local watershed. The sacrifice of a small percentage of the public body of water to create jobs and bottled water is ethical within the utilitarian theory. In Robert Nick’s entitlement theory, you are entitled to as much property as you want, as long as it was acquired the right way. Sanctuary Springs is viewed as a public source of water. Which means Nestle is completely entitled to use the water, whether that means drinking it or pumping it to a bottling plant. Nestles actions are completely ethical within Nick’s theory. Under John Rails theory of ethics, Nestles actions are ethical as well. Rails theory states that the action must benefit the weakest members of society. The company has built bottling plant that employs about a hundred people. Town ship supervisor Maxine McClellan is has stated â€Å"This is probably the best project we’ve ever brought into Mascots County†¦ A diversified economy where our kids don’t have to move away to find jobs. How to cite Battling over bottled water, Papers

Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement free essay sample

Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement? What Is the Difference Between Stupidity and Ignorance? Plan and Write an Essay in Which You Develop Your Point of View on the Issue. Support Your Position with Reasoning By goldmedalist Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is the difference between stupidity and ignorance? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on the issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience or observations. 1) The differences between stupidity and ignorance are many. Stupidity is the state of being unable to become intelligent. Ignorance is the state of being not informed. Stupidity is complete; ignorance can be partial. Stupidity does not know of its own stupidity. Ignorance sometimes does and sometimes does not know of its own ignorance. Stupidity does not desire to be made different. We will write a custom essay sample on Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Ignorance sometimes does and sometimes does not desire to be made different. (2) Stupidity is total. A person is stupid or he is not. Stupid people do not become great at one thing, but not at other things. Stupid people do not achieve greatness in any areas of their lives. They are too stupid to strive for greatness, although sometimes greatness may be thrust upon them. (3) Stupid people do not know that they are stupid. They perceive the world from their own dim, thickness. They think that other people are either good or bad, which means that other people are either acceptable to them or not, they lump all eople that they do not understand into good or bad based on popular opinion and not on personal Judgment. Stupid people do not have Judgment, stupid people have opinions. (4) Stupid people do not wish to change. They stupidly accept the life they have been born into. They do not question what they think is good or bad about their lives, they Just live. Some things make them happy, some things make them sad, but they do not think deeply. (5) Ignorant people are people who have the intelligence to change from being gnorant to being informed. Ignorant people who have the intelligence to change and do not, remain ignorant. Ignorant people who have the intelligence to change and do so are called educated, talented, refi ned or unignorant. (6) Ignorant people are aware that there are things they need to learn. The desire and the ability to learn will make these ignorant people become unignorant. Ignorant people see the world from many points of view, they will understand that there are many opinions and many