Ta-Da! The Longlists for the 2019 National Book Awards

Ta-Da! The Longlists for the 2019 National Book Awards Its that time of year again!!!! “What is your favorite season?” #NBAwards pic.twitter.com/FbOwojD1iv Anna Dobben (@annadobben) September 16, 2019 The National Book Foundation announced all longlists for the  2019 National Book Awards this week, and I could not be more excited. The NBAs are the Academy Awards for books. There are five categories: Fiction, Nonfiction, Poetry, Translated Literature, and Young People’s Literature.  And this years nominees are AMAZING. Heres a rundown of the titles: Young People’s Literature View this post on Instagram Its the first day of #NBAwards Longlist announcements! We are beyond excited to announce the ten titles on the 2019 National Book Awards Longlist for Young Peoples Literature. Congratulations to all, and welcome to the family! . . #bookstagram #NBAwards #literature #reading #amreading #books #yabookstagram A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 16, 2019 at 7:36am PDT Kwame Alexander and Kadir Nelson, The Undefeated Versify / Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Laurie Halse Anderson, Shout Viking Books for Young Readers / Penguin Random House Akwaeke Emezi, Pet Make Me a World / Penguin Random House Cynthia Kadohata, A Place to Belong Atheneum/Caitlyn Dlouhy Books / Simon Schuster Jason Reynolds, Look Both Ways: A Tale Told in Ten Blocks Atheneum/Caitlyn Dlouhy Books / Simon Schuster Randy Ribay, Patron Saints of Nothing Kokila / Penguin Random House Laura Ruby, Thirteen Doorways, Wolves Behind Them All Balzer + Bray / HarperCollins Publishers Martin W. Sandler, 1919: The Year That Changed America Bloomsbury Children’s Books / Bloomsbury Publishing Hal Schrieve, Out of Salem Triangle Square / Seven Stories Press Colleen AF Venable and Ellen T. Crenshaw, Kiss Number 8 First Second Books / Macmillan Publishers From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are An Na, the author of four novels, including A Step from Heaven, a finalist for the 2017 National Book Award; Elana K. Arnold, whose novel What Girls Are Made Of  was a finalist for the 2017 National Book Award; Kristen Gilligan, the co-owner of Tattered Cover Book Store, in Denver; Varian Johnson, the author of The Parker Inheritance  and a member of the faculty at Vermont College of Fine Arts; and Deborah Taylor, a retired librarian and an adjunct professor of young-adult literature at the University of Maryland. Translated Literature View this post on Instagram We are so pleased to announce the Longlist for the #NBAwards   for Translated Literature, the fifth Awards category introduced just last year. A huge round of applause for these writers and translators! . . #bookstagram #books #literature #literaryawards #reading #amreading #translation #translator #translatedliterature A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 17, 2019 at 7:36am PDT Rioter Pierce Alquist, who is an expert on translated literature, also did a great round-up of the titles here. The ten titles on the longlist, originally written in ten different languages, include seven novels, two memoirs, and a collection of essays. Naja Marie Aidt, When Death Takes Something from You Give It Back: Carl’s Book Translated by Denise Newman Coffee House Press Eliane Brum, The Collector of Leftover Souls: Field Notes on Brazil’s Everyday Insurrections Translated by Diane Grosklaus Whitty Graywolf Press Nona Fernández, Space Invaders Translated by Natasha Wimmer Graywolf Press Vigdis Hjorth, Will and Testament Translated by Charlotte Barslund Verso Fiction / Verso Books Khaled Khalifa, Death Is Hard Work Translated by Leri Price Farrar, Straus Giroux / Macmillan Publishers László Krasznahorkai, Baron Wenckheim’s Homecoming Translated by Ottilie Mulzet New Directions Scholastique Mukasonga, The Barefoot Woman Translated by Jordan Stump Archipelago Books Yoko Ogawa, The Memory Police Translated by Stephen Snyder Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Pajtim Statovci, Crossing Translated by David Hackston Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Olga Tokarczuk, Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead Translated by Antonia Lloyd-Jones Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Keith Gessen, a founding editor of n+1, and the author, most recently, of A Terrible Country; Elisabeth Jaquette, a translator and the executive director of the American Literary Translators Association; Katie Kitamura, whose most recent novel, A Separation, has been translated into sixteen languages; Idra Novey, the author of Those Who Knew, who teaches fiction at Princeton University; and Shuchi Saraswat, who has worked at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, GrubStreet, and an independent bookseller. Poetry View this post on Instagram Its day three of #NBAwards  Longlist announcements, and we have ten amazing collections to share with you. Announcing  the Longlist for the 2019 National Book Award for Poetry. . . #bookstagram #literature #books #reading #amreading #literaryawards #literaryaward #poetry #poetrycommunity A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 18, 2019 at 7:47am PDT Dan Beachy-Quick, Variations on Dawn and Dusk Omnidawn Publishing Jericho Brown, The Tradition Copper Canyon Press Toi Derricotte, ‘I’: New and Selected Poems University of Pittsburgh Press Camonghne Felix, Build Yourself a Boat Haymarket Books Ilya Kaminsky, Deaf Republic Graywolf Press Ariana Reines, A Sand Book Tin House Books Mary Ruefle, Dunce Wave Books Carmen Giménez Smith, Be Recorder Graywolf Press Arthur Sze, Sight Lines Copper Canyon Press Brian Teare, Doomstead Days Nightboat Books From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Jos Charles, the author of feeld,  which was longlisted for the 2017 National Book Award for Poetry; John Evans, the owner of DIESEL, a bookstore in Los Angeles; Vievee Francis, who has written three books of poetry, including Forest Primeval; Cathy Park Hong, the poetry editor of  The New Republic  and the author of Engine Empire; and Mark Wunderlich, the director of the Bennington Writing Seminars graduate program, whose new book, God of Nothingness,  is forthcoming. Nonfiction View this post on Instagram It’s Nonfiction day! ?? ?The #NBAwards excitement continues with the fourth category of the weeks announcements. These are the ten titles longlisted for the National Book Award for Nonfiction.? . . #bookstagram #literature #literaryawards #literaryaward #books #reading #amreading #nonfiction #memoir A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 19, 2019 at 7:30am PDT Hanif Abdurraqib, Go Ahead in the Rain: Notes to A Tribe Called Quest University of Texas Press Sarah M. Broom, The Yellow House Grove Press / Grove Atlantic Tressie McMillan Cottom, Thick: And Other Essays The New Press Carolyn Forché, What You Have Heard is True: A Memoir of Witness and Resistance Penguin Press / Penguin Random House Patrick Radden Keefe, Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland Doubleday / Penguin Random House David Treuer, The Heartbeat of Wounded Knee: Native America from 1890 to the Present Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House Greg Grandin, The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Metropolitan Books / Macmillan Publishers Iliana Regan, Burn the Place: A Memoir Agate Midway / Agate Publishing, Inc. Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership The University of North Carolina Press Albert Woodfox with Leslie George, Solitary Grove Press / Grove Atlantic From the New Yorker announcement: The judges for the category this year are Erica Armstrong Dunbar, a professor of history at Rutgers University and a finalist for a 2017 National Book Award; Carolyn Kellogg, an award-winning culture writer and former books editor of the Los Angeles  Times; Mark Laframboise, who has worked for more than twenty years at the Politics and Prose bookstore, in Washington, D.C.; Kiese Laymon, the author, most recently, of Heavy: An American Memoir,  and a professor of English at the University of Mississippi; and Jeff Sharlet, an editor-at-large for  Virginia Quarterly Review, a winner of a National Magazine Award, and an associate professor at Dartmouth College. Fiction View this post on Instagram ?? Its the final list! ? We are absolutely thrilled to announce the ten books on the Longlist for the 2019 National Book Award for Fiction. #NBAwards . . #bookstagram #books #literature #literaryawards #literaryaward #reading #amreading #fiction A post shared by National Book Foundation (@nationalbookfoundation) on Sep 20, 2019 at 7:30am PDT Taffy Brodesser-Akner, Fleishman Is in Trouble Random House / Penguin Random House Susan Choi, Trust Exercise Henry Holt Company / Macmillan Publishers Kali Fajardo-Anstine, Sabrina Corina: Stories One World / Penguin Random House Marlon James, Black Leopard, Red Wolf Riverhead Books / Penguin Random House Laila Lalami, The Other Americans Pantheon Books / Penguin Random House Kimberly King Parsons, Black Light: Stories Vintage / Penguin Random House Helen Phillips, The Need Simon Schuster Julia Phillips, Disappearing Earth Alfred A. Knopf / Penguin Random House Ocean Vuong, On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous Penguin Press / Penguin Random House Colson Whitehead, The Nickel Boys Doubleday / Penguin Random House From the New Yorker announcement: This year’s judges for the category were Dorothy Allison, the author of Bastard out of Carolina,  a National Book Award finalist; Ruth Dickey, the executive director of Seattle Arts Lectures; Javier Ramirez, a longtime Chicago indie-book seller and the co-owner of Madison Street Books; Danzy Senna, a recipient of the Whiting Award and the author, most recently, of New People, a New York  Times  Notable Book; and Jeff VanderMeer, the best-selling author of the Southern Reach Trilogy, whose work has been translated into thirty-eight languages. Congratulations to all the nominees! Im so glad I dont have to pick, because my head would explode. The shortlists will be announced October 8, and the winners will be announced November 20 at the  70th National Book Awards Ceremony.

7 Writing Contests for Kids

Essay on causes of french revoultionary war - 1624 Words

The causes of the French Revolution, the uprising which brought the regime of King Louis XVI to an end, were manifold. France in 1789 was one of the richest and most powerful nations in Europe; only in Great Britain and the Netherlands did the common people have more freedom and less chance of arbitrary punishment. Nevertheless, the ancien rà ©gime was brought down, partly by its own rigidity in the face of a changing world, partly by the ambitions of a rising bourgeoisie, allied with aggrieved peasants and wage-earners and with individuals of all classes who were influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment. As the revolution proceeded and as power devolved from the monarchy to legislative bodies, the conflicting interests of these†¦show more content†¦The proletariat and the non-bourgeois strata of the middle class had either not yet evolved interests which were different from those of the bourgeoisie or they did not yet constitute independent classes or class divisions. Therefore, where they opposed the bourgeoisie, as they did in France in 1793 and 1794, [that is to say, during the Reign of Terror] they fought only for the attainment of the aims of the bourgeoisie, albeit in a non-bourgeois manner. The entire French terrorism was just a plebeian way of dealing with the enemies of the bourgeoisie: absolutism, feudalism and philistinism.\\\\\\ [1] (http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/12/15.htm) Economics Debt Since 1614, the French monarchy had operated without resort to a legislature. Kings had managed their fiscal affairs by increasing the burden of the ancient and unequal system of taxes, by borrowing money, and sometimes by selling noble titles and other privileges; however, because noble titles exempted the holder from future taxes, the purchasers of titles were effectively buying an annuity. This led to the long-running fiscal crisis of the French government. On the eve of the revolution, France was deeply indebted, so deeply as to be effectively bankrupt. Extravagant expenditures by Louis XIV on luxuries such as Versailles were compounded by heavy expenditures on the Seven Years War

Battling over bottled water Free Essays

Spring, which is on a private deer-hunting ranch, to the bottling plant. Locals are questioning whom the water Nestle is pumping belongs to. The argument is that although Nestle owns the land, the water is a public resource. We will write a custom essay sample on Battling over bottled water or any similar topic only for you Order Now Within the Utilitarian theory, in the eyes of the Nestle Company, their actions can be deemed ethical for the fact that the bottling plant has created a substantial amount of jobs for the locals. It was stated that the 262 million gallons of water being pumped are less than one percent of the annual charge rate of the local watershed. The sacrifice of a small percentage of the public body of water to create jobs and bottled water is ethical within the utilitarian theory. In Robert Nick’s entitlement theory, you are entitled to as much property as you want, as long as it was acquired the right way. Sanctuary Springs is viewed as a public source of water. Which means Nestle is completely entitled to use the water, whether that means drinking it or pumping it to a bottling plant. Nestles actions are completely ethical within Nick’s theory. Under John Rails theory of ethics, Nestles actions are ethical as well. Rails theory states that the action must benefit the weakest members of society. The company has built bottling plant that employs about a hundred people. Town ship supervisor Maxine McClellan is has stated â€Å"This is probably the best project we’ve ever brought into Mascots County†¦ A diversified economy where our kids don’t have to move away to find jobs. How to cite Battling over bottled water, Papers

Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement free essay sample

Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement? What Is the Difference Between Stupidity and Ignorance? Plan and Write an Essay in Which You Develop Your Point of View on the Issue. Support Your Position with Reasoning By goldmedalist Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is the difference between stupidity and ignorance? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on the issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience or observations. 1) The differences between stupidity and ignorance are many. Stupidity is the state of being unable to become intelligent. Ignorance is the state of being not informed. Stupidity is complete; ignorance can be partial. Stupidity does not know of its own stupidity. Ignorance sometimes does and sometimes does not know of its own ignorance. Stupidity does not desire to be made different. We will write a custom essay sample on Do You Agree or Disagree with This Statement? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Ignorance sometimes does and sometimes does not desire to be made different. (2) Stupidity is total. A person is stupid or he is not. Stupid people do not become great at one thing, but not at other things. Stupid people do not achieve greatness in any areas of their lives. They are too stupid to strive for greatness, although sometimes greatness may be thrust upon them. (3) Stupid people do not know that they are stupid. They perceive the world from their own dim, thickness. They think that other people are either good or bad, which means that other people are either acceptable to them or not, they lump all eople that they do not understand into good or bad based on popular opinion and not on personal Judgment. Stupid people do not have Judgment, stupid people have opinions. (4) Stupid people do not wish to change. They stupidly accept the life they have been born into. They do not question what they think is good or bad about their lives, they Just live. Some things make them happy, some things make them sad, but they do not think deeply. (5) Ignorant people are people who have the intelligence to change from being gnorant to being informed. Ignorant people who have the intelligence to change and do not, remain ignorant. Ignorant people who have the intelligence to change and do so are called educated, talented, refi ned or unignorant. (6) Ignorant people are aware that there are things they need to learn. The desire and the ability to learn will make these ignorant people become unignorant. Ignorant people see the world from many points of view, they will understand that there are many opinions and many

Nurse Scheduling Problem

Nurse scheduling refers to the process of assigning working schedules or programmes to nursing practitioners in their places of work.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Nurse Scheduling Problem specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The process entails giving different working schedules to a certain number of nursing practitioners who possess varied skills and qualifications, while at the same time conforming to important aspects that needs to be addressed such as personal preferences, existing working practices, rules and regulations, and ethical standards (Coomber Louise, 2007). This, actually, is part of a larger capacity plan that needs a more effective implementation to ensure that the nursing role is achieved within various units of health care. Obviously, a well-planned nurse scheduling exercise is likely to satisfy the interests of nurses, thus generating a positive impact upon the services extended to p atients in health care facilities. The many problems associated with the scheduling of nursing practitioners can be observed from vast areas of medical and health care application in both public and private sectors. In fact, these problems are of great concern to human well-being, and for that reason, have attracted the attention of numerous researchers from allover the world. The researchers are eager to develop appropriate systems that can successfully be used to undertake these crucial processes. This paper examines the literature research of nurse scheduling problem along with a general overview of some of the different techniques that have been used to address this complex issue of health care. Nurse scheduling problem is actually a major issue of concern in the health care department, considering its diverse constraints that are likely to affect the quality of nurse responsibilities in hospitals. Nurse scheduling simply entails the short-term timetabling of nurses in their wor k. This timetabling is a very crucial aspect of the health care department, since it ensures that proper and effective nursing care service is provided to patients in health care facilities around the clock (Azaiez Al Sharif, 2005).Advertising Looking for research paper on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In this regard, the implementation of the entire plan will depend on some key considerations that would include the period of planning, type of shift, soft constraints and hard constraints, work-related constraints, workplace regulations, and categories of knowledge or qualification, among other crucial aspects. As it would be observed, some of the various techniques that have been used to schedule nurses in their work have failed to offer credible results, thus making nurse scheduling one of the biggest challenges in health care matters. Numerous studies have shown the scheduling of nursing practitioners to be a common problem when it comes to the assignment of staff personnel in hospitals and other health care facilities. Long-term and short-term staffing of nurses in modern-day health care units comes with many challenges, possibly because of the many variations in staffing needs or requirements. However, most of these challenges will tend to come as a result of various factors such as imbalances of the nursing responsibilities between different working shifts in a day, and variations in the personal wishes of nursing practitioners and the need to maintain acceptable service levels. Nurse scheduling is not just about ensuring that health care facilities have sufficient number of nursing practitioners, but also that there are enough nurses who possess the desired skill mix on duty around the clock to take care of the patients (Burke et al., 2004). Nurse scheduling problem is mainly about nurse shift and holiday assignment, whereby the nursing professionals have wishes or restrictions that must be recognized and respected. The big problem here, however, is to come up with perfect schedules or programmes that would both fulfill the ultimate goal of health care in a particular setting and respect the diverse constraints of the nursing practitioners within that setting.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Nurse Scheduling Problem specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this regard, good nurse scheduling systems must be able to satisfy a number of factors to ensure patient in different health care environments have access to effective and proper health care. Nursing practitioners face both hard constraints and soft constraints in matters regarding scheduling. One common constraint faced by these professionals in their job is that, they cannot be assigned to all the shifts in a day, without being given a break (Louw, Nieuwoudt Vuuren, 2007). Nursing practitioners can also leave for holidays, an d in that case, will not be expected to take duty shifts in the course of that time. Another common constraint here is that, it would not be possible for nurses to take night shifts and day shifts consecutively. In this regard, there is always a need to ensure that all these constraints are taken into consideration when conducting nurse scheduling. In other words, the wishes and preferences of nurses should be maximally satisfied, but not to an extend where they can compromise the quality of health care given to patients. There are various objectives for proper nurse scheduling in any health care facility, and these would include things such as the required skills and available workforce size (Ernst, Jiang Krishnamoorthy, 2004). A wide range of solution approaches have been applied in an attempt to solve the broad issues associated with nurse scheduling. These approaches, however, are grouped into several categories that include automatic approaches, systematic approaches, heuristi c or mathematical approaches, and manual ways, which have been in use across the world for a very long time. The most common techniques drawn from the above approaches that have been used to tackle nurse scheduling problem include GRASP, integral programming, linear programming, heuristic approach, constraint programming and mixed-integer programming.Advertising Looking for research paper on health medicine? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Manual approaches mostly comprise of the ancient techniques that were used to tackle the issue of nurse scheduling within health care facilities in the past. Unlike the modern techniques that are performed using computer-aided programs and other sophisticated ways, the early techniques mainly relied on manual procedures, such as the use of hand (Refalo, 2004). However, even though these techniques had proved to be useful in the past, they are faced with many challenges when it comes to modern aspects of health care. In other terms, the early techniques cannot effectively address the diverse complexities of nursing demands and interests presented by the current world where everything appears to have taken a different course, owing to the influential impacts of modernity. This explains the reason as to why many health care facilities across the world have decided to settle for computerized scheduling systems, which are more effective and reliable compared to the early techniques. As i t would be observed, the early techniques are associated with a number of advantages and disadvantages. One big advantage of these early is that they are cheap, since their application entails manual operation. However, a common limitation with the approaches is that they cannot be reliable for effective scheduling, since they have a lot of errors. GRASP simply stands for ‘Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedures.’ This multi-start process operates in two main phases. First, there is the construction phase, which establishes a feasible answer to a problem, and whose surroundings are studied until a local minima is identified. Then there is the local search phase, which uses the procedure of a local search to the constructed outcome or result in hope of modifying it further. According to Bellanti, Carello Croce (2004), GRASP is arguably one of the most effective heuristic approaches commonly applied to provide better solutions for nurse scheduling problems in the co ntemporary world. There are numerous advantages linked to this approach, and some of these will include guaranteed optimality at the end, easy implementation, and better solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. However, one major limitation associated with the technique is that, it is stuck in a local minima, thus lacking robustness on a wide scope of problem instances. Linear programming is another methodology that has proved to be very effective when it comes to matters of nurse scheduling. This is a mathematical approach applied using computer simulation to establish the best possible solution to nurse scheduling problems. The concept was first introduced in the course of the Second World War, with the aim of optimizing the allocation of material and resources that were critical to the war success. This technique is used to establish optimal solutions to issues that can be expressed with the use of linear equations and inequalities (Harmeier, 1991). In fact, researchers have found the method to be very accurate in finding the best solutions for real world problems such as nurse scheduling. In this case, a linear program would comprise of variables, linear constraints that describe the limit on the values of applied variables, and a linear objective function that shows the impact of each variable to determine the expected results. This approach offers a number of advantages to the vast areas where it is applied. One of the most evident advantages of the approach is that it provides optimum application of the necessary productive factors. The approach also provides for improved qualities of decisions. More importantly, the technique applies sensitivity analysis, which enables people to make modifications on the linear problem to obtain the modified outcome. Apart from the benefits highlighted above, this technique also has a number of limitations on its side. One major problem with the technique is that, it can only be relevant to situations where li near goal functions and limitations apply. Another common drawback of the technique is that, aspects of climate conditions and other doubts are usually not put into consideration, and this is likely to interfere with the outcome credibility. Integer programming is the other technique that has proved effective in tackling the issue of nurse scheduling problem in hospitals. Typically, this approach will express the optimization of a subject of a linear function to various linear constraints. In cases where this approach is applied to solve real world problems such as nurse scheduling, a modeling phase upon which the problem is translated into a mathematical concept will be required. One major advantage of this technique in solving combinatorial optimization problems is that, the problems can be resolved to optimal results within a reasonable period of time. This technique has proved to be sufficiently flexible in addressing nurse rostering demands within health care units, and for tha t reason, it is widely applied in hospitals across the world to ensure that nurse timetables are tailored to fit their personal interests, without having to compromise the quality of care targeted on patients (Okada, 1992). Just like other techniques used in research based on combinatorial optimization problems, integer programming is also associated with a number of advantages and disadvantages. One common advantage of the approach is the absence of rounding errors. This particular aspect plays a significant role in improving the credibility of outcomes in research. More importantly, it makes comparison of figures or numbers simple and more reliable. In terms of the limitations, the technique has a limited value range, which is arguably one of the biggest disadvantages associated with it. As it has been shown in this research paper, nurse scheduling problem is a crucial and complex practice that calls for a lot of attention from hospital managers and other service facilitators in t he health care department. The wide scope of literature about this particular matter is a real manifestation of the big concern of humans in matters of health, particularly the ones that are affiliated to nursing responsibilities in health care facilities. It is also evident from this research paper that, even though early techniques of tackling nurse scheduling are no longer effective, there is much hope in the computer-aided approaches and other sophisticated systems that are used in the modern day. However, based on findings from previous literature, there is room for further studies to address the complex issue of nurse scheduling problems. References Azaiez, M., Al Sharif, S. (2005). A 0-1 goal-programming model for nurse scheduling. Computers Operations Research, 32(3), 491-507. http://www.pom.ir/wp-content/uploads/PDF/goal%20programming%20model%20for%20nurse%20scheduling.pdf Bellanti, G., Carello, F., Croce, R. (2004). A greedy-based neighborhood search approach to a nurse rostering problem. European Journal of Operational  Research, 153(15), 28-40. Burke, K., De Causmaecker, G., Vanden Berghe, H. Landeghem, V. (2004). The state of the art of nurse rostering. Journal of Scheduling, 7(15), 441-499. Coomber, B., Louise, B. (2007). Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: a review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(2), 297-314. http://www. journalofnursingstudies.com/article/S0020-7489%2806%2900066-6/abstract Ernst, A., Jiang, H., and Krishnamoorthy, M. (2004). Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models. European Journal of Operational  Research, 153(1), 3-27.http://www.sciencedirect.com /science/article /pii/ S037722170300095X Harmeier, P. E. (1991). Linear Programming for Optimization of Nurse Scheduling. Computers in Nursing, 9(4), 149-151. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 21245916_Linear_Programming_for_opti mization_of_nurse_scheduling Louw, M., Nieuwoudt, J. Vuuren, V. (2007). Finding good nursing duty schedules: A case study. Journal of Scheduling, 10(7), 387-405.http://link.springer. com/ article/10.1007%2Fs10951-007-0035-7 Okada, M. (1992). An Approach to the Generalized Nurse Scheduling Problem- Generation of a Declarative Program to Represent Institution-Specific Knowledge. Computers and Biomedical Research, 25(5), 417- 434.http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ycbmr/article/0010-4809%2892%2990002-R/abstract Refalo, P. (2004). Impact based strategies for constraint programming. CP2004, 11(7), 557-571. http://www.crt.umontreal.ca/~pesant/BIRS/pesant-IBS.pdf This research paper on Nurse Scheduling Problem was written and submitted by user Dayton Ortiz to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Potsdam conferance in 1945 essays

Potsdam conferance in 1945 essays Last conference was set in Potsdam in 1945. President Churchill, Truman and Joseph Stallen attended this conference. President Truman didnt like the Soviet and soviet didnt like the Truman. They all met at Potsdam for finalizing plan for Europe. They have solved many objectives during this conference. Their first objective was Division of Germany. Second objective was the Iran and Greece. At Potsdam their first objective was division of Germany. They didnt know how to divide and who gets what but finally they come with solution. Germany was divided in half, east and west. West will be occupied by U.S, England and France and east will be occupied by Soviet Union. They will divide city of Berlin. U.S, England and France started to rebuild East Germany. On the west side Soviet start stealing everything they can put their hand on. They stole rail road, industries everything. They start destroying East Germany. Russian thought U.S was rebuilding West Germany to attack on Russia. First conference took place in Iran. Iran shares the common border with Soviet Union. Iran also had natural gas that interested Soviet Union. On early stage Iran was with the Germany. During the WWII the threat was Iran will supply oil to Germany and keep the war going. So U.S and Soviet sanded troops to Iran and stop the oil transportation. They took over it. After war they suppose to draw their troops out. Soviet didnt draw their troops out. U.S draws their troops out. Soviet wanted to see what U.S will do to stop taking over Iran. U.S force Soviet to draw their troops out of Iran. Soviet saw this as threat. They thought that U.S was rebuilding around Soviet to attack on Soviet. There was another problem begin in Greece and Turkey. Turkey was neutral during the war but it had many economical problems. It shared common border with Russia. Greece was occupied by Germany during Second World War. In 1944 Soviet agree ...